Câu hỏi phỏng vấn CAP Theorem
Câu hỏi

Can you 'got around' or 'beat' the CAP Theorem?

Câu trả lời

The CAP theorem, also known as Brewer's theorem, states that in a distributed data store, it is impossible to simultaneously achieve all three of the following properties: Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance. This theorem was formally proven by Seth Gilbert and Nancy Lynch in 2002[17].

Can You "Get Around" or "Beat" the CAP Theorem?

The short answer is no, you cannot "beat" the CAP theorem in the sense of achieving all three properties simultaneously in the presence of a network partition. However, there are strategies and techniques to manage the trade-offs and mitigate the limitations imposed by the theorem.

Understanding the Trade-offs

  1. Consistency (C): Ensures that all nodes see the same data at the same time. If a value is written to one node, any subsequent reads from any node should return that same value.
  2. Availability (A): Ensures that every request receives a response, even if some nodes are down.
  3. Partition Tolerance (P): Ensures that the system continues to operate despite network partitions.

According to the CAP theorem, in the event of a network partition, a distributed system must choose between consistency and availability. This means you can only achieve two out of the three properties at any given time under partition conditions[17].

Techniques to Manage CAP Trade-offs

  1. Eventual Consistency: This approach sacrifices immediate consistency for availability and partition tolerance. Systems like DynamoDB and Cassandra use eventual consistency, where updates propagate to all nodes eventually, but not immediately[2][11].

  2. Immutable Data: By using immutable data and computing queries from scratch, some systems claim to simplify the complexities introduced by the CAP theorem. This approach avoids the issues of incremental updates and read-repair, making eventual consistency easier to reason about[1][6].

  3. Quorum-based Approaches: These involve requiring a certain number of nodes (a quorum) to agree before a read or write operation is considered successful. This allows for a trade-off between consistency and availability[4].

  4. PACELC Theorem: An extension of the CAP theorem, PACELC states that even in the absence of partitions, there is a trade-off between latency and consistency. This helps in fram...

middle

middle

Gợi ý câu hỏi phỏng vấn

senior

Explain when CA from CAP is possible?

senior

What does atomic (or linearizable) consistency mean?

middle

What does the CAP Theorem actually say?

Bình luận

Chưa có bình luận nào

Chưa có bình luận nào