Is it better to return NULL or empty values from functions/methods where the return value is not
present?
Is it better to return NULL or empty values from functions/methods where the return value is not
present?
In software architecture, the decision to return NULL or an empty value from functions or methods when no return value is present depends on the context of the application and the expectations of the function's consumers. Here’s a detailed analysis of both approaches:
Returning NULL is generally used to indicate the absence of a value. This approach is particularly useful when it is important to distinguish between an empty value and the absence of a value. For example, in a function that retrieves a user from a database by their ID, returning NULL could explicitly indicate that no user exists for the given ID.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Returning an empty value (like an empty string, empty list, or a similar default object) can simplify the calling code by eliminating the need for NULL checks. This approach is often used in functions that return collections, strings, or similar data structures where an empty version of the expected return type can be naturally handled by the calling code.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
middle
Gợi ý câu hỏi phỏng vấn
Chưa có bình luận nào