Differences and Similarities Between Lumen and Laravel
Similarities:
Origin and Creator: Both Lumen and Laravel were created by Taylor Otwell and are licensed under the MIT license[2][4][6].
Core Components: Lumen uses many of the same components as Laravel, including the Artisan CLI, routing, logging, caching, and validation[6][10].
Syntax: Lumen uses Laravel's syntax, making it easy to upgrade from Lumen to Laravel if needed[2][6].
Views: There are no differences in using views between Lumen and Laravel; both use the Blade templating engine[7].
Service Container: Both frameworks use the same service container, allowing for dependency injection and class management[10].
Differences:
Framework Type:
Laravel: A full-stack web application framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern[2][3][4].
Lumen: A micro-framework designed for building high-performance microservices and APIs[2][3][4].
Performance:
Lumen: Known for its speed and can handle more requests per second compared to Laravel. For instance, Lumen can handle around 100 requests per second[1][3][5].
Laravel: Slower in terms of speed and response time due to its extensive features and capabilities[1][3][5].
Usage:
Laravel: Ideal for large-scale applications, enterprise-level solutions, and projects requiring complex features like event queuing, templating, and extensive third-party integrations[2][3][4].
Lumen: Best suited for small applications, microservices, and APIs where performance and speed are critical[2][3][4].
Features and Capabilities:
Laravel: Supports a wide range of features including HTTP sessions, cookies, templating, and complex SQL queries. It also has a powerful ORM (Eloquent) and supports event queuing[2][3][4][6].
Lumen: Stripped down to essential features for performance, lacking support for HTTP sessions, cookies, and complex SQL queries. It focuses ...
