Câu hỏi phỏng vấn Graph Theory
Câu hỏi

What are key difference...

Câu trả lời

Breadth-First Search (BFS) and Depth-First Search (DFS) are two fundamental graph traversal algorithms used in computer science. Here are the key differences between them:

1. Traversal Order

  • BFS: Traverses the graph level by level, starting from the root node and exploring all its neighbors before moving on to the next level. This means it explores all nodes at the present depth before moving on to nodes at the next depth level[1][3][7].
  • DFS: Traverses the graph by going as deep as possible along each branch before backtracking. It explores a node and then one of its children, continuing this process until it reaches a node with no unvisited children, at which point it backtracks[1][3][7].

2. Data Structures Used

  • BFS: Uses a queue to keep track of the next node to visit. This queue follows the First In First Out (FIFO) principle, ensuring that nodes are explored in the order they were discovered[1][3][7].
  • DFS: Uses a stack to keep track of the next node to visit. This stack follows the Last In First Out (LIFO) principle, ensuring that the most recently discovered node is explored next. DFS can also be implemented using recursion, which implicitly uses the call stack[1][3][7].

3. Completeness

  • BFS: Is a complete algorithm, meaning it will find a solution if one exists. This is because it explores all nodes at the current depth before moving deeper, ensuring that all possible paths are considered[1][3][7].
  • DFS: Is not guaranteed to be complete, especially in graphs with infinite paths or cycles, as it may get stuck exploring a deep branch indefinitely[1][3][7].

4. Optimality

  • BFS: Is optimal for finding the shortest path in an unweighted graph, as it explores all nodes at the current depth before moving deeper, ensuring the shortest path is found first[1][3][7].
  • DFS: Is not guaranteed to find the shortest path, as it may find a longer path before backtracking to explore other branches[1][3][7].

5. Time Complexity

  • Both BFS and DFS have a time complexity of $$O(V + E)$$, where $$V$$ is the number of vertices and $$E$$ is the number of edges. This is because both algorithms need to visit every vertex and edge in the graph[5][19].

6. Space Complexity

  • BFS: Has a higher space complexity, $$O(V)$$, as it needs to store all nodes at the current level in the queue[1][3][7].
  • DFS: Has a lower space complexity, $$O(V)$$, as it only needs to store the current path in the stack. However, in the worst case (e.g., a very deep tree), the space complexity can also be $$O(V)$$[1][3][7].

7. Applications

  • BFS: Is used in scenarios where the shortest path is required, such as in unweighted graphs, finding the shortest path in a maze, or in peer-to-peer networks to find all neighb...
senior

senior

Gợi ý câu hỏi phỏng vấn

middle

What is difference between BFS and Dijkstra's algorithms when looking for shortest path?

middle

Explain the BSF (Breadth First Search) traversing method

senior

How do we know whether we need to use BSF or DSF algorithm?

Bình luận

Chưa có bình luận nào

Chưa có bình luận nào